fall - Dave's Blog

MSDN covers the topic of JavaScript and WinRT type conversions provided by Chakra (JavaScript Representation of Windows Runtime Types and Considerations when Using the Windows Runtime API), but for the questions I get about it I’ll try to lay out some specifics of that discussion more plainly. I’ve made a TL;DR JavaScript types and WinRT types summary table.

Chakra, the JavaScript engine powering the Edge browser and JavaScript Windows Store apps, does the work to project WinRT into JavaScript. It is responsible for, among other things, converting back and forth between JavaScript types and WinRT types. Some basics are intuitive, like a JavaScript string is converted back and forth with WinRT’s string representation. For other basic types check out the MSDN links at the top of the page. For structs, interface instances, class instances, and objects things are more complicated.

A struct, class instance, or interface instance in WinRT is projected into JavaScript as a JavaScript object with corresponding property names and values. This JavaScript object representation of a WinRT type can be passed into other WinRT APIs that take the same underlying type as a parameter. This JavaScript object is special in that Chakra keeps a reference to the underlying WinRT object and so it can be reused with other WinRT APIs.

However, if you start with plain JavaScript objects and want to interact with WinRT APIs that take non-basic WinRT types, your options are less plentiful. You can use a plain JavaScript object as a WinRT struct, so long as the property names on the JavaScript object match the WinRT struct’s. Chakra will implicitly create an instance of the WinRT struct for you when you call a WinRT method that takes that WinRT struct as a parameter and fill in the WinRT struct’s values with the values from the corresponding properties on your JavaScript object.

// C# WinRT component
        public struct ExampleStruct
        {
            public string String;
            public int Int;
        }

        public sealed class ExampleStructContainer
        {
            ExampleStruct value;
            public void Set(ExampleStruct value)
            {
                this.value = value;
            }

            public ExampleStruct Get()
            {
                return this.value;
            }
        }

// JS code
        var structContainer = new ExampleWinRTComponent.ExampleNamespace.ExampleStructContainer();
        structContainer.set({ string: "abc", int: 123 });
        console.log("structContainer.get(): " + JSON.stringify(structContainer.get()));
        // structContainer.get(): {"string":"abc","int":123}

You cannot have a plain JavaScript object and use it as a WinRT class instance or WinRT interface instance. Chakra does not provide such a conversion even with ES6 classes.

You cannot take a JavaScript object with arbitrary property names that are unknown at compile time and don’t correspond to a specific WinRT struct and pass that into a WinRT method. If you need to do this, you have to write additional JavaScript code to explicitly convert your arbitrary JavaScript object into an array of property name and value pairs or something else that could be represented in WinRT.

However, the other direction you can do. An instance of a Windows.Foundation.Collections.IPropertySet implementation in WinRT is projected into JavaScript as a JavaScript object with property names and values corresponding to the key and value pairs in the IPropertySet. In this way you can project a WinRT object as a JavaScript object with arbitrary property names and types. But again, the reverse is not possible. Chakra will not convert an arbitrary JavaScript object into an IPropertySet.

// C# WinRT component
        public sealed class PropertySetContainer
        {
            private Windows.Foundation.Collections.IPropertySet otherValue = null;

            public Windows.Foundation.Collections.IPropertySet other
            {
                get
                {
                    return otherValue;
                }
                set
                {
                    otherValue = value;
                }
            }
        }

        public sealed class PropertySet : Windows.Foundation.Collections.IPropertySet
        {
            private IDictionary map = new Dictionary();

            public PropertySet()
            {
                map.Add("abc", "def");
                map.Add("ghi", "jkl");
                map.Add("mno", "pqr");
            }
            // ... rest of PropertySet implementation is simple wrapper around the map member.
            

// JS code
    var propertySet = new ExampleWinRTComponent.ExampleNamespace.PropertySet();
    console.log("propertySet: " + JSON.stringify(propertySet));
    // propertySet: {"abc":"def","ghi":"jkl","mno":"pqr"}

    var propertySetContainer = new ExampleWinRTComponent.ExampleNamespace.PropertySetContainer();
    propertySetContainer.other = propertySet;
    console.log("propertySetContainer.other: " + JSON.stringify(propertySetContainer.other));
    // propertySetContainer.other: {"abc":"def","ghi":"jkl","mno":"pqr"}

    try {
        propertySetContainer.other = { "123": "456", "789": "012" };
    }
    catch (e) {
        console.error("Error setting propertySetContainer.other: " + e);
        // Error setting propertySetContainer.other: TypeError: Type mismatch
}

There’s also no way to implicitly convert a DOM object into a WinRT type. If you want to write third party WinRT code that interacts with the DOM, you must do so indirectly and explicitly in JavaScript code that is interacting with your third party WinRT. You’ll have to extract the information you want from your DOM objects to pass into WinRT methods and similarly have to pass messages out from WinRT that say what actions the JavaScript should perform on the DOM.

Level 5 of the Stripe CTF revolved around a design issue in an OpenID like protocol.

Code

    def authenticated?(body)
      body =~ /[^\w]AUTHENTICATED[^\w]*$/
    end

...

      if authenticated?(body)
        session[:auth_user] = username
        session[:auth_host] = host
        return "Remote server responded with: #{body}." \
               " Authenticated as #{username}@#{host}!"

Issue

This level is an implementation of a federated identity protocol. You give it an endpoint URI and a username and password, it posts the username and password to the endpoint URI, and if the response is 'AUTHENTICATED' then access is allowed. It is easy to be authenticated on a server you control, but this level requires you to authenticate from the server running the level. This level only talks to stripe CTF servers so the first step is to upload a document to the level 2 server containing the text 'AUTHENTICATED' and we can now authenticate on a level 2 server. Notice that the level 5 server will dump out the content of the endpoint URI and that the regexp it uses to detect the text 'AUTHENTICATED' can match on that dump. Accordingly I uploaded an authenticated file to

https://level02-2.stripe-ctf.com/user-ajvivlehdt/uploads/authenticated

https://level05-1.stripe-ctf.com/user-qtoyekwrod/?pingback=https%3A%2F%2Flevel02-2.stripe-ctf.com%2Fuser-ajvivlehdt%2Fuploads%2Fauthenticated&username=a&password=a

Notes

I didn't see any particular code review red flags, really the issue here is that the regular expression testing for 'AUTHENTICATED' is too permisive and the protocol itself doesn't do enough. The protocol requires only a set piece of common literal text to be returned which makes it easy for a server to accidentally fall into authenticating. Having the endpoint URI have to return variable text based on the input would make it much harder for a server to accidentally authenticate.